<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it Art?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://incredipete.com/archives/907/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/907</link>
	<description>The Republic will endure until Congress finds it can bribe the public with the public&#039;s money. - Alexis de Tocqueville</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:23:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: livieloo</title>
		<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/907/comment-page-1#comment-11914</link>
		<dc:creator>livieloo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incredipete.com/?p=907#comment-11914</guid>
		<description>I agree with Danjeruskurves</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Danjeruskurves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McMichael Newby</title>
		<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/907/comment-page-1#comment-11913</link>
		<dc:creator>McMichael Newby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 11:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incredipete.com/?p=907#comment-11913</guid>
		<description>Art is whatever.

That&#039;s the conclusion I came to at the end of my art education and art career. It&#039;s not a statement I&#039;m thrilled about but one that is more honest than any other I have ever come across. Art is anything. Art is everything. Art is whatever. Pretty liberal thing to say, I know. 

I personally believe art is like love. This begs the question: is art, like love, qualitative or quantitative? If only a handful of people perceive something to be art and a majority don&#039;t, does that mean it&#039;s not art? Maybe it&#039;s simply ahead of its time. Maybe that handful of people have no taste or any sense of what art truly is. If I say I madly and truly love my wife but someone out there who gets 10,000 people to say I don&#039;t, does that mean I actually don&#039;t love my wife? Or does that majority know something that I don&#039;t?

What could possibly help validate one&#039;s opinion/perception about art then?

Guidelines.

This is a fairly accurate way of distinguishing between the art vs. porn issue:
Subjects should not be positioned in a manner to suggest sexual penetration, genital to genital contact, genital to anal contact, oral to genital contact, oral to breast contact or oral to anal contact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art is whatever.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the conclusion I came to at the end of my art education and art career. It&#8217;s not a statement I&#8217;m thrilled about but one that is more honest than any other I have ever come across. Art is anything. Art is everything. Art is whatever. Pretty liberal thing to say, I know. </p>
<p>I personally believe art is like love. This begs the question: is art, like love, qualitative or quantitative? If only a handful of people perceive something to be art and a majority don&#8217;t, does that mean it&#8217;s not art? Maybe it&#8217;s simply ahead of its time. Maybe that handful of people have no taste or any sense of what art truly is. If I say I madly and truly love my wife but someone out there who gets 10,000 people to say I don&#8217;t, does that mean I actually don&#8217;t love my wife? Or does that majority know something that I don&#8217;t?</p>
<p>What could possibly help validate one&#8217;s opinion/perception about art then?</p>
<p>Guidelines.</p>
<p>This is a fairly accurate way of distinguishing between the art vs. porn issue:<br />
Subjects should not be positioned in a manner to suggest sexual penetration, genital to genital contact, genital to anal contact, oral to genital contact, oral to breast contact or oral to anal contact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanjerusKurves</title>
		<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/907/comment-page-1#comment-11912</link>
		<dc:creator>DanjerusKurves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 03:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incredipete.com/?p=907#comment-11912</guid>
		<description>I generally use Boticelli, Ruben, and Boris Vallejo/Julie Bell (for whom I have modeled) as my guidelines.  I think that nudity without genitalia is artistic ... display of the genitals (not just the female pubic region), to me, constitutes porn.  The difference is erotic versus explicit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I generally use Boticelli, Ruben, and Boris Vallejo/Julie Bell (for whom I have modeled) as my guidelines.  I think that nudity without genitalia is artistic &#8230; display of the genitals (not just the female pubic region), to me, constitutes porn.  The difference is erotic versus explicit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJD</title>
		<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/907/comment-page-1#comment-11911</link>
		<dc:creator>BJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 02:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incredipete.com/?p=907#comment-11911</guid>
		<description>I think the body is an amazing thing, but for too many people, &quot;art&quot; is just another word for &quot;sleaze.&quot;. How about art as subtlety, nuance,mystery, and privacy, rather than in-your-face and perversion of good things?  Art?  Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the body is an amazing thing, but for too many people, &#8220;art&#8221; is just another word for &#8220;sleaze.&#8221;. How about art as subtlety, nuance,mystery, and privacy, rather than in-your-face and perversion of good things?  Art?  Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
