<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Say Kansas is Conservative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://incredipete.com/archives/557/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/557</link>
	<description>Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions. G.K. Chesterton</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: warcrygirl</title>
		<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/557#comment-10839</link>
		<dc:creator>warcrygirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incredipete.com/archives/557#comment-10839</guid>
		<description>I agree with everyone above.  Hey, what can I say?  I got here too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everyone above.  Hey, what can I say?  I got here too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJD</title>
		<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/557#comment-10838</link>
		<dc:creator>BJD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incredipete.com/archives/557#comment-10838</guid>
		<description>Pete, you are so totally right on.

GoingLoopy's comment, "If you don't want the kid..." says it all.  It IS a "kid."  Women seven months pregnant who want a child call it a "baby" and go down one corridor, and women seven months pregnant who don't want a child call it a "fetus" and go down the other corridor.  How can it be a baby or a fetus depending on whether or not someone wants it/him/her?  How can it change from a "baby" to a "fetus" if she changes her mind seven months into it?  This is not only immoral, it's stupid.  When does life begin?  Duh.  It begins when it begins.

Women should have the right to do whatever they want - have a baby, not have a baby, have sex, not have sex, use birth control, not use birth control, sleep with creepy guys, not sleep with creepy guys - but once you have the baby, once you're pregnant, the line is drawn and you don't get to kill it.  A six-month old (out of the womb) baby is no more "viable" than one in the womb - it can't do anything to keep itself alive - but you don't get to kill it.  The fact that you can't see the unborn baby doesn't create a license to kill.

Why haven't they put a video of a Tiller late-term abortion on television?  They show everything else.  It's because watching him crush the skull of an actual baby and suck out her brains would end ALL abortion in America overnight.  People would feel no better after watching a baby born after being aborted with saline (burning the skin and torturing the baby) or cut up into pieces in a D&#38;C abortion.  People who support abortion without having watched one may be sincere, but they are speaking from incredible ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, you are so totally right on.</p>
<p>GoingLoopy&#8217;s comment, &#8220;If you don&#8217;t want the kid&#8230;&#8221; says it all.  It IS a &#8220;kid.&#8221;  Women seven months pregnant who want a child call it a &#8220;baby&#8221; and go down one corridor, and women seven months pregnant who don&#8217;t want a child call it a &#8220;fetus&#8221; and go down the other corridor.  How can it be a baby or a fetus depending on whether or not someone wants it/him/her?  How can it change from a &#8220;baby&#8221; to a &#8220;fetus&#8221; if she changes her mind seven months into it?  This is not only immoral, it&#8217;s stupid.  When does life begin?  Duh.  It begins when it begins.</p>
<p>Women should have the right to do whatever they want - have a baby, not have a baby, have sex, not have sex, use birth control, not use birth control, sleep with creepy guys, not sleep with creepy guys - but once you have the baby, once you&#8217;re pregnant, the line is drawn and you don&#8217;t get to kill it.  A six-month old (out of the womb) baby is no more &#8220;viable&#8221; than one in the womb - it can&#8217;t do anything to keep itself alive - but you don&#8217;t get to kill it.  The fact that you can&#8217;t see the unborn baby doesn&#8217;t create a license to kill.</p>
<p>Why haven&#8217;t they put a video of a Tiller late-term abortion on television?  They show everything else.  It&#8217;s because watching him crush the skull of an actual baby and suck out her brains would end ALL abortion in America overnight.  People would feel no better after watching a baby born after being aborted with saline (burning the skin and torturing the baby) or cut up into pieces in a D&amp;C abortion.  People who support abortion without having watched one may be sincere, but they are speaking from incredible ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoingLoopy</title>
		<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/557#comment-10837</link>
		<dc:creator>GoingLoopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incredipete.com/archives/557#comment-10837</guid>
		<description>I'd have to agree with Andria.  I'm definitely a member of the pro-choice camp, but 13?  Yeah.  And the late-term abortions are not good, either.  You know you're pregnant way before 6-7 months, so if you wanted to choose to abort, you need to do it sooner.  By 6-7 months, if you don't want the kid, just have it and give it up for adoption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with Andria.  I&#8217;m definitely a member of the pro-choice camp, but 13?  Yeah.  And the late-term abortions are not good, either.  You know you&#8217;re pregnant way before 6-7 months, so if you wanted to choose to abort, you need to do it sooner.  By 6-7 months, if you don&#8217;t want the kid, just have it and give it up for adoption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andria</title>
		<link>http://incredipete.com/archives/557#comment-10836</link>
		<dc:creator>Andria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://incredipete.com/archives/557#comment-10836</guid>
		<description>I'm sure I don't have to tell you where I stand on the abortion issue, however, I agree with you that a 13 year old shouldn't be allowed to have an abortion without the parents knowing (I also disagree with late-term abortions). I don't think teenage girls should even be allowed to be on the pill without parents knowing. Parents not knowing what their kids are doing is the reason they're pregnant at 13 to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure I don&#8217;t have to tell you where I stand on the abortion issue, however, I agree with you that a 13 year old shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to have an abortion without the parents knowing (I also disagree with late-term abortions). I don&#8217;t think teenage girls should even be allowed to be on the pill without parents knowing. Parents not knowing what their kids are doing is the reason they&#8217;re pregnant at 13 to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
